{"type":"data","nodes":[null,{"type":"data","data":[{"tweet":1},{"edit_info":2,"retweeted":9,"source":10,"entities":11,"display_text_range":43,"favorite_count":45,"in_reply_to_status_id_str":46,"id_str":5,"in_reply_to_user_id":21,"truncated":9,"retweet_count":19,"id":5,"in_reply_to_status_id":46,"created_at":47,"favorited":9,"full_text":48,"lang":49,"in_reply_to_screen_name":17,"in_reply_to_user_id_str":21},{"initial":3},{"editTweetIds":4,"editableUntil":6,"editsRemaining":7,"isEditEligible":8},[5],"1267565055769485315","2020-06-01T21:43:54.172Z","5",true,false,"\u003Ca href=\"https://mobile.twitter.com\" rel=\"nofollow\">Twitter Web App\u003C/a>",{"hashtags":12,"symbols":13,"user_mentions":14,"urls":42},[],[],[15,22,29,36],{"name":16,"screen_name":17,"indices":18,"id_str":21,"id":21},"Chad Skelton","chadskelton",[19,20],"0","12","17533332",{"name":23,"screen_name":24,"indices":25,"id_str":28,"id":28},"Alberto Cairo","AlbertoCairo",[26,27],"13","26","34255829",{"name":30,"screen_name":31,"indices":32,"id_str":35,"id":35},"Stephanie Evergreen","evergreendata",[33,34],"27","41","101474181",{"name":37,"screen_name":37,"indices":38,"id_str":41,"id":41},"Datawrapper",[39,40],"42","54","500573974",[],[19,44],"332","2","1267558211457966081","Mon Jun 01 21:13:54 +0000 2020","@chadskelton @AlbertoCairo @evergreendata @Datawrapper Let's not forget that Datawrapper *does* default to baseline zero in all line charts where zero would be within a certain proximity of the chart area. We can argue about parameters, but always defaulting to baseline zero would be a mistake. I'm pretty happy with our solution 😀","en"],"uses":{"params":["tweetid"]}}]}